Shakespeare in the Classroom: to be or not to be?
This paper explores the arguments surrounding Shakespeare's place in the classroom amid recent changes to the National Curriculum. First, it will explore arguments suggesting that the works of William Shakespeare are not relevant to the lives of young people today: as a result, the compulsory study of Shakespeare in schools risks alienating students, many of whom come from different ethnic backgrounds. Once acknowledging these arguments, however, the paper will propose that the themes and ideas that run through Shakespeare's works are universal, surpassing barriers such as race and class. In this way, the plays are as relevant today as on the day they were written. The paper will argue that rather than Shakespeare being irrelevant, it is outdated teaching practices that limit the benefits of Shakespeare. Finally, the paper will explore a range of creative approaches to the teaching and learning of Shakespeare which possess the potential to significantly increase student engagement.
AHRC Press (2013). British Black and Asian Shakespeare. [video] Available at: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/arts/english/research/currentprojects/multiculturalshakespeare [Accessed 30 Oct. 2016].
Aubrey, K. and Riley, A. (2016). Understanding and Using Educational Theories. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Balinska-Ourdeva, V., Johnston, I., Mangat, J. and McKeown, B. (2013). 'What Say these Young Ones': Students' Responses to Shakespeare-An Icon of Englishness. Interchange, 44 (3/4), pp. 333-347.
Blocksidge, M. (2005). Shakespeare in Education. London: Continuum.
Coles, J. (2013). ‘Every child's birthright’? Democratic entitlement and the role of canonical literature in the English National Curriculum. Curriculum Journal, 24 (1), pp. 50-66.
Department for Education, (2014). The national curriculum in England: Key stages 3 and 4 framework document, [online]. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/381754/SECONDARY_national_curriculum.pdf [Accessed 21 Oct. 2016].
Department for Education, (2016). Schools, pupils, and their characteristics: January 2016, [online]. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/552342/SFR20_2016_Main_Text.pdf [Accessed 20 Jan. 2017].
Dusbiber, D. (2015). Why I don’t want to assign Shakespeare anymore (even though he’s in the Common Core). The Washington Post, [online]. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2015/06/13/teacher-why-i-dont-want-to-assign-shakespeare-anymore-even-though-hes-in-the-common-core/ [Accessed 15 Oct. 2016].
Gibson, R. (1998). Teaching Shakespeare. Reprint, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Irish, T. (2011). Would you risk it for Shakespeare? A case study of using active approaches in the English classroom. English in Education, 45 (1), pp. 6-19.
Johnston, K. and Maurer, M. (2002). Teaching and risk: Doing and undoing Shakespeare, in Skrebels, P., and Van der Hoeven, S. (Eds), For All Time?: Critical Issues in Teaching Shakespeare. Kent Town, South Australia: Wakefield Press, pp. 100-112.
Jordan, A., Carlile, O., and Stack, A. (2008). Approaches to Learning: A Guide for Teachers. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Kapadia, P. (1997). Bastardizing the Bard: Appropriations of Shakespeare's Plays in Post-colonial India. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
Lighthill, B. (2011). ‘Shakespeare’– an endangered species? English in Education, 45 (1), pp. 36 – 51.
Maus, K. (2008). Introduction: “Henry V.” In: S. Greenblatt, W. Cohen, J. Howard, K. Maus, eds. 2008. The Norton Shakespeare. 2nd ed. 2008. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 1471-1480.
Muijs, D. (2012). Understanding how pupils learn: theories of learning and intelligence, in Brooks, V., Abbott, I., and Huddleston P. (Eds.), Preparing to Teach in Secondary Schools, 3rd ed. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill, pp. 41-58.
Paton, G. (2013). National Curriculum overhaul: pupils to study more Shakespeare. The Telegraph, [online]. Available at: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/10166697/National-Curriculum-overhaul-pupils-to-study-more-Shakespeare.html [Accessed 29 Oct. 2016].
Powell, Mark (2014). Kill Bill: why we must take Shakespeare out of the classroom. The Guardian, [online]. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/culture-professionals-network/culture-professionals-blog/2014/mar/17/kill-bill-shakespeare-classroom-theatre [Accessed 1 Oct. 2016].
Powell, Mary (2010). Moving into Shakespeare: Using Kinesthetic Activities to Teach Shakespearean Text. California English, 15 (4), pp. 6-8.
Reynolds, P. (2012). Not Just for Actors: Shakespeare and Emotion in the Literature Classroom. Theatre Topics, 22 (2), pp. 163-171.
Seymour, R. (2016). Why not to fear teaching Shakespeare to young learners. British Council, [online]. Available at: https://www.britishcouncil.org/voices-magazine/why-not-fear-teaching-shakespeare-young-learners [Accessed 28 Oct. 2016].
Stevens, M. (2014). Petitioning Secretary of State for Education Nicky Morgan MP: Reconsider the changes to English Literature GCSE. Change.org, [online]. Available at: https://www.change.org/p/nicky-morgan-mp-reconsider-the-changes-to-english-literature-gcse/ [Accessed 15 Oct. 2016].
Sutton Trust, (2016). White working class boys have lowest GCSE Grades as disadvantaged Bangladeshi, African and Chinese pupils show dramatically improved results, [online]. Available at: http://www.suttontrust.com/newsarchive/white-working-class-boys-have-lowest-gcse-grades-as-disadvantaged-bangladeshi-african-and-chinese-pupils-show-dramatically-improved-results/. [Accessed 20 Jan. 2017].
Thomas, P. (2016). 12 Quick Ways of… Getting Them into Shakespeare (and Shakespeare into Them). NATE: Teaching English, (11), pp. 42-45.
Ward, S. and Connolly, R. (2008). Let them eat Shakespeare: prescribed authors and the National Curriculum. Curriculum Journal, 19 (4), pp. 293-307.
Warner, C. (1997). Building Shakespearean Worlds in the Everyday Classroom. In: R. Salomone, J. Davis, eds. 1997. Teaching Shakespeare into the Twenty-First Century. Athens: Ohio University Press. pp. 147-153.
Waterman, A. (2015). Theories of Cognitive Development, including Piaget and Vygotsky. [video] Available at: http://thepsychologyfaculty.org/psychology/theories-of-cognitive-development-including-piaget-and-vygotsky-amanda-waterman/ [Accessed 28 Oct. 2016].
Woodcock, M. (2008). Shakespeare - Henry V: A reader's guide to essential criticism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Copyright (c) 2017 Sandeep Purewal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal, providing it is not used for commercial purposes and any derivative work is shared with the same license.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).