Submissions
Login or Register to make a submission.

Author Guidelines

Authors are invited to make a submission to this journal. All submissions will be assessed by an editor to determine whether they meet the aims and scope of this journal. Those considered to be a good fit will be sent for peer review before determining whether they will be accepted or rejected. An editor may desk reject a submission if it does not meet minimum standards of academic rigour. 

The peer review process will be open, meaning that the reviewers and authors will not be anonymised. The rationale for this is to encourage collegial and constructive feedback and for the author(s) to feel supported in the review process. 

Before making a submission, authors are responsible for obtaining permission to publish any material included with the submission, such as photos, documents and datasets. All authors identified on the submission must consent to be identified as an author. Where appropriate, research should be approved by an appropriate ethics committee in accordance with the legal requirements of the study's country.

Submission Genres

We welcome submissions in a variety of creative, multi-modal and traditional formats. The following list is intended to give a flavour of the types of submission that may be considered for publication; it is not exhaustive. Similarly, the word counts given should be regarded as helpful guides rather than strict limits.  

Regardless of the length and format, editors are looking for submissions which are academically rigorous and which drive the field of EAP forwards. 

Original Research Articles 

4,000-8,000 words 

Studies should advance the field of EAP with methodological rigour.  

Case Studies 

3,000-6,000 words 

These contributions offer concise, scholarly insights into particular practices, examples, or initiatives, whether large or small in scale. As well as outlining the context and purpose of the work, authors should situate their case study within relevant academic literature. Critical evaluation is key, as is identifying how the work might contribute to the development of EAP. 

Critical Reflection on EAP Practice 

3,000-4,000 words 

Authors are invited to offer reflective analyses of EAP practice, grounded in practitioner-led enquiry or personal reflection. The onus here is on questioning and theorising one’s own practice. These submissions aim to question established approaches, promote innovation, and introduce fresh perspectives based on previous experience or work, in order to drive EAP forwards. 

Archive Project 

2,000-4,000 words 

The Archive Project offers a space to preserve ideas, analyses, or explorations that emerged from other projects but didn’t fit their final form (e.g., a thesis, article, book chapter). These ‘side-quests’ may inspire future research or support others in developing related work. 

Work in Progress 

1,000-3,000 words 

These are brief reports on ongoing projects or initiatives aimed at advancing EAP, which are still in the early stages of development, or which present preliminary findings. The goal of these papers is to share emerging work of interest, with the intention that they may lead to full-length original research articles. 

In Conversation 

1,000-3,000 words 

These submissions may include, but are not limited to, conversations with EAP authors, presenters, materials developers and practitioners. While they may be practice based, they should be grounded in theory and contribute to the evolution of EAP. The piece should make it clear why this conversation maters to EAP now. 

Policy/institutional perspectives 
1,000–3,000 words 
Analyses of institutional, policy, or cultural factors shaping EAP provision (e.g., transnational education models, AI integration, decolonisation, interdisciplinary collaboration). 

Opinion Pieces 

1,000-2,000 words 

As well as clearly stating a position, these should be thought-provoking, engaging and evidence based. As with all submissions, the focus should be on advancing EAP. 

EAP Materials / Events Reviews 

1,000-2,000 words 

Authors are invited to provide a critical analysis of EAP materials or a conference, presentation or other event. The emphasis should not just be on summarizing the content, but more importantly on evaluating and reflecting on the resource or event. A key aspect is exploring how it has influenced the authors’ teaching practice or research, and how it might drive EAP forwards. 

 

Before submitting, please follow the checklist below to prepare your submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

All submissions must meet the following requirements.

  • Your manuscript is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, RTF or WordPerfect document file format.
  • Your manuscript text is single-spaced in a single column, uses an 11-point font (ideally Calibri or Arial) and employs italics rather than underlining (except for DOI or URLs).
  • Your manuscript adheres to the basic stylistic, word count and bibliographic requirements outlined in the journals' Author Guidelines.
  • Any illustrations, figures, images or tables are placed within your manuscript at appropriate points with descriptive captions, along with source citations if appropriate.
  • Your manuscript has not been previously published, nor is currently under consideration by another journal. Note: all submissions undergo originality screening before being accepted for consideration.
  • All DOIs (preferably) or URLs (if a DOI is not given) for references have been included, along with last access date - where available.
  • Any third-party-owned (copyrighted) material included in your manuscript (e.g., images, illustrations, etc.,) has been identified with appropriate source citation, and if necessary, permission obtained from the rights holder for its inclusion.

Articles

Section default policy

Privacy Statement

BALEAP Journal of Research and Practice will process your data exclusively as an author, reviewer or registered reader to operate this journal and its associated quality assurance and publication processes. The legal bases for processing this personal data are contract and legitimate interest. As a function of the journal publication process, we will publicly share elements of author's personal data (name, affiliation, contact information) to promote their research profile and career prospects. Additionally, for journal management and quality assurance, the personal data of reviewers and authors may be shared with editorial board members. Other than these exceptions, your personal data will not be shared or disclosed to any third parties.

The journal will also use your information in tracking of associated items through the publishing lifecycle and notifying you of progress or required contributions (e.g. reviews, revisions requests, copy editing, post-publication feedback). It will also use it to notify you of new publications, calls for papers or key news about the journal.

You may access or delete your user account at any time via your personal profile.  Alternatively, to request access to any personal data we hold on you, or to request deletion of your BALEAP Journal user account and personal data, please contact: 
open.research@warwick.ac.uk