The Renaming of Those Hidden by the State: Mexico City’s La Glorieta de las Mujeres que Luchan
PDF

Keywords

feminist activism
feminist anti-monuments
feminist public art
feminist artistic activism

How to Cite

Stengel, N. (2023). The Renaming of Those Hidden by the State: Mexico City’s La Glorieta de las Mujeres que Luchan. Alternautas, 10(2), 93–118. https://doi.org/10.31273/an.v10i2.1410

Abstract

This article examines the anti-monument La glorieta de las mujeres que luchan, designed and stealthily placed by the Mexican collectives Antimonumenta and the Frente Amplio de Mujeres que Luchan to recognise the socio-political relevance of the feminist activists, commemorate and name victims of feminicide, decolonise the city and question the patriarchal official historical narrative. The wooden statue of a girl and the renaming of the site took place on 25 September 2021, after Mexico City’s government removed the statue of Christopher Columbus (to protect it from activists) and proposed to replace it with a monument that reproduced colonialist and patriarchal political mechanisms. I argue that La glorieta de las mujeres que luchan is a useful tool to remember the feminist protest and a memorial for victims of feminicide; meanwhile, it confronts the patriarchal historic narrative. Since the statue resulted from consent amongst feminist groups, it successfully represents the majority of women engaging in different movements against gender-based violence. The statue is located in Paseo de la Reforma, the most important avenue in Mexico City, where only two of the monuments represent female figures (both mythological characters) surrounded by several representations of male heroes. Drawing on Suzanne Lacy’s concept of “new genre public art” (Lacy, 1995) –popularised in Mexico by feminist artist Mónica Mayer– and Julia Antivilo’s (Antivilo Peña, 2008) (‘Ponencia Arte Feminista-Julia Antivilo’, 2020) analysis of feminist activism, I argue that the anti-monument is a constant reminder of feminist’s demands and stands as a perpetual activist act.

https://doi.org/10.31273/an.v10i2.1410
PDF

References

«Antimonumento. Espacio público». s. f.

Apolinar Navarro, Adriana, Lidia Aguilar Balderas, y Octavio Humberto Moreno Velador. 2022. «Protestas feministas en Ciudad de México y Puebla. Entre la legitimidad y la crítica social». Revista Pares 2 (1): 63-93.

Badilla Rajevic, Manuela. 2019. «Ephemeral and Ludic Strategies of Remembering in the Streets: A Springboard for Public Memory In Chile». Sociological Forum 34 (3): 729-51. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1111/socf.12522.

Barrera, Bárbara. 2023. «María Galindo: “El feminismo deja de incomodar cuando se vuelve un patrimonio elegante de pequeñas élites”». Palabra Pública, de enero de de 2023, sec. Sociedad. https://palabrapublica.uchile.cl/maria-galindo-el-feminismo-deja-de-incomodar/.

Colectiva Registro Callejero, dir. 2020. Performance colectivo Las Tesis «Un violador en tu camino». Online Videorecording, YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aB7r6hdo3W4.

Comisión Mexicana de Defensa y Promoción de los Derechos Humanos. 2021. «Frente Amplio de la Glorieta de las Mujeres que Luchan». Human Rights. Derecho a la memoria, justicia. Mexico City: Comisión Mexicana de Defensa y Promoción de los Derechos Humanos. https://cmdpdh.org/caso-frente-amplio-de-lacaso-glorieta-de-las-mujeres-que-luchan/.

Curiel, Ochy. 2016. «Rethinking Radical Anti-Racist Feminist Politics in a Global Neoliberal Context». Traducido por Manuela Borzone y Alexander Ponomareff. Meridians: feminism, race, ransnationalism 14 (2): 46-55.

Délano Alonso, Alexandra, y Benjamin Nienass. 2023. «Memory Protest and Contested Time: The Antimonumentos Route in Mexico City». Sociologica 17 (1): 9-23. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/16942.

Georgetown Institute for WOmen, Peace and Security y Peace Research Institute Oslo. Washington, DC. «Women, Peace and Security Index 2021/2022: Tracking Sustainable Peace through Inclusion, Justice and Security for Women». GIWPS and PRIO.

Heinrich Böll Stiftung. 2020. Antimonumentos. Memoria, Verdad y Justicia. Ciudad de México: Henrich Böll Stiftung.

INEGI. 2022. Violencia contra las mujeres en México. ENDIREH 2021. Ciudad de México: INEGI.

Lacy, Suzanne. 1995. Mapping the Terrain. New Genre Public Art. Second Edition. Seattle: Bay Press.

Lagarde y de los Ríos, Marcela. 2006. «Del femicidio al feminicidio». Desde el jardín de Freud 6: 216-22.

———. 2012. «Las leyes de violencia de género en México: medidas de prevención y sensibilización». Redur 10: 253-75.

———. 2015. Los cautiverios de las mujeres: madresposas, monjas, putas, presas y locas. Mexico City: Siglo XXI and UNAM.

LasTesis. 2023. Set Fear on Fire. Traducido por Camila Valle. London: Verso Books.

Lippard, Lucy R. 1996. «Looking Around Where We Are, Where We Could Be». En Mapping the Terrain, New Genre Public Art, editado por Suzanne Lacy, 114-30. Seattle: Bay Press.

Ovalle, Lilian Paola, y Alfonso Díaz Tovar. 2019. Memoria prematura. Una década de guerra en México y la conmemoración de sus víctimas. Ciudad de México: CONACYT y Heinrich Böll Stiftung Ciudad de México.

PortavozTV, dir. 2019. Lorena Wolffer, entrevista en dos partes. YouTube Video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rDB45jEWwpA.

Rigney, Ann. 2022. «Toxic Monuments and Mnemonic Refime Change». Studies on National Movements 9: 7-41.

Rodríguez López, Édgar. 2019. «Fenómenos de la desmemoria en Chihuahua: protesta social e intervención del espacio público». Tenso Diagonal, n.o 8: 190-99.

Rozental, Sandra. 2021. «La joven de Amajac: ¿"la mujer indígena" que nos dio patria?» Revista Común, 20 de octubre de 2021. https://revistacomun.com/blog/la-joven-de-amajac-la-mujer-indigena-que-nos-dio-patria/.

Russell, Diana, y Jill Radford, eds. 1992. Femicide. The Politics of Woman Killing. USA: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Valencia, Sayak. 2010. Capitalismo Gore. Primera Edición. España: Editorial Melusina, S.L.

———. 2018. «El transfeminismo no es un generismo». Pléyade 22: 27-43. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0719-36962018000200027.

Vázquez Camacho, Santiago José. 2019. «El caso “campo algodonero” ante la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos». Anuario Mexican de Derecho Internacional 11 (enero): 2010.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Natalia Stengel

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.