Keywords
Brazil
Amazon
ribeirinhos
development
knowledge
How to Cite
How to Cite
Abstract
This paper considers the dialectic of territorialization at play between the Brazilian state and traditional peoples (ribeirinhos) in Amazonia through Nick Clare, Victoria Habermehl, and Liz Mason-Deese’s (2018) theorization of poder and potencia. The interplay between poder and potencia becomes evident throughout the modern history of Brazilian development initiatives, interventions by capital, and social movements organized by traditional peoples. Territories of poder and potenica in the Brazilian Amazon draw from this history of dialectic territorializations which finds contemporary form in knowledge discourses and resource politics. The poder of the Brazilian state and extractive corporations utilizes both overwhelming scale and personal confrontations to facilitate resource requisitions. The potencia promised by traditional territories—reciprocal socioecologies connected to Amazonian ecosystems—suggests power derived from overlapping territorialities between humans and nonhumans. Through interviews and counter-mapping with the São Francisco community, we demonstrate that the place-based lifeways (“modo de vida”) of the community also sustain prefigurative potential for a territory that exceeds the logics of the state and capital.
References
Acosta, A. (2017). Living Well: ideas for reinventing the future. Third World Quarterly, 38(12), 2600–2616. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2017.1375379
Agnew, J. (1994). The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of international political economy, 1(1), 53-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692299408434268
Agrawal, A. (2005). Environmentality: Technologies of Government and the Making of Subjects. Duke University Press.
Allegretti, M. (2007). Deforestation and Poor Amazonians. The American Prospect, 10 Aug. 2007, https://prospect.org/special-report/deforestation-poor-amazonians/
Anderson, K., & Smith, S. J. (2001). Editorial: Emotional Geographies. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 26(1), 7–10. http://www.jstor.org/stable/623141
Barbosa, L. (2015). Guardians of the Brazilian Amazon Rainforest. Routledge.
Borda, O. F. (2000). El territorio como construcción social. Revista Foro, (38), 45-51.
“Brazil's Indigenous to Sue Bolsonaro for Saying They're 'Evolving'.” (2020). Reuters, 24 Jan. 2020, https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-brazil-indigenous-idUKKBN1ZN1T8
Clare, N., Habermehl, V., & Mason-Deese, L. (2018). Territories in contestation: relational power in Latin America. Territory, Politics, Governance, 6(3), 302–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2017.1294989
Coletta, R. D. & Holanda, M. (2022). “Bolsonaro volta a afirmar que Putin defendeu soberania do Brasil sobre Amazônia.” Folha de S.Paulo. 8 March 2022, https://aovivo.folha.uol.com.br/mundo/2022/02/24/6105-acompanhe-as-principais-noticias-sobre-a-guerra-na-ucrania.shtml#post413938
Coombes, B., Johnson, J. T., & Howitt, R. (2012). Indigenous geographies I: Mere resource conflicts? The complexities in Indigenous land and environmental claims. Progress in Human Geography, 36(6), 810–821. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132511431410
Cusicanqui, R. S. (2020). Ch'ixinakax Utxiwa: On practices and discourses of decolonisation. Polity Press.
Escobar, A. (2008). Territories of difference: Place, movements, life, redes. Durham: Duke University Press.
Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the Pluriverse. Duke University Press.
Fernandes, B. M. (2012). Movimentos Socioterritoriais E Movimentos Socioespaciais: A Contribuição Teórica Para Uma Leitura Geográfica Dos Movimentos Sociais. Revista Nera, (6), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.47946/rnera.v0i6.1460
Garfield, S. (2013). In Search of the Amazon. Duke University Press.
Giménez, G. (2000). Territorio, cultura e identidades. Globalización y regiones en México, 19-33.
Gomes, C. V. A., Alencar, A., Vadjunec, J. M., & Pacheco, L. M. (2018). Extractive Reserves in the Brazilian Amazon thirty years after Chico Mendes: Social movement achievements, territorial expansion and continuing struggles. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, 48(November), 74–98. https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v48i0.58830
Gonzales, T., & Husain, M. (2016). Indigenous autonomy, community-based research, and development aid: Sumaq kawsay in three epistemic scenarios. AlterNative, 12(3), 266–281. https://doi.org/10.20507/AlterNative.2016.12.3.5
Guzmán, N. (2017). Tierra, agroindustria y transgénicos: Conflictos sociales populares en la Bolivia de la Madre Tierra. Perspectivas Rurales Nueva Época, (30). https://doi.org/10.15359/prne.15-30.2
Guzmán, N. (2021). “‘Esta carretera nos atraviesa’: Indigenous girls’ body-territory mapping in the emergence of Chinese capital in the Bolivian Amazon.” Master’s thesis. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin.
Haesbaert, R. (2008). Dos múltiplos territórios à multiterritorialidade. In A emergência da multiterritorialidade: a ressignificação da relação do humano com o espaço. Heidrich, A [et al.] (ed). Canoas/Porto Alegre: Ed. ULBRA/EdUFGRS.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist studies, 14(3), 575-599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
Hecht, S. (2011). The new Amazon geographies: Insurgent citizenship, “Amazon Nation” and the politics of environmentalisms. Journal of Cultural Geography, 28(1), 203-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/08873631.2011.548500
Hecht, S. & Cockburn, A. (1990). The Fate of the Forest. University of Chicago Press.
Holston, J. (2008). Insurgent Citizenship. Princeton University Press.
Hope, J. (2016). Losing ground? Extractive-led development versus environmentalism in the Isiboro Secure Indigenous Territory and National Park (TIPNIS), Bolivia. Extractive Industries and Society, 3(4), 922–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2016.10.005
Ince, A. (2012). In the shell of the old: Anarchist geographies of territorialisation. Antipode, 44(5), 1645-1666. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2012.01029.x
Kantner, B. (2021). Direitos territoriais e coalizações locais-internacionais: uma pesquisa em curso (original Portuguese title). In Conversazioni Dal Sud Pratiche Politiche, Educative E Di Cura, ed. M Muraca, 145-153. Rome: SCIE.
Kohn, E. (2013). How Forests Think: toward an Anthropology beyond the Human. University of California Press.
Litfin, K. T. (1997). The gendered eye in the sky: a feminist perspective on earth observation satellites. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 18(2), 26-47. https://doi.org/10.2307/3346964
Lopes, M. (2020). “Brazil's Bolsonaro Calls Amazon Deforestation 'Cultural,' Says It 'Will Never End'.” The Washington Post. 20 Nov. 2019, www.washingtonpost.com/world/the_americas/brazils-bolsonaro-calls-amazon-deforestation-cultural-says-it-will-never-end/2019/11/20/ba536498-0ba3-11ea-8054-289aef6e38a3_story.html.
Lopes, R. (2023). “Cresce atuação da Força Nacional em territórios indígenas por causa de conflitos.” Folha de S.Paulo. 12 June 2023, https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/cotidiano/2023/06/cresce-atuacao-da-forca-nacional-em-territorios-indigenas-por-causa-de-conflitos.shtml
Lourenço, M. (2023). “Esquerda e direita dirigem o mesmo trem colonialista, diz quilombola Antônio Bispo.” Folha de S.Paulo. 28 May 2023, https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/cotidiano/2023/05/esquerda-e-direita-dirigem-o-mesmo-trem-colonialista-diz-quilombola-antonio-bispo.shtml
Manzanal, M. (2014). Desarrollo: Una perspectiva crítica desde el análisis del poder y del territorio; Instituto Argentino para el Desarrollo Económico; Realidad Económica 283; 5-2014; 17-48.
Mignolo, W. (2007). Delinking: The rhetoric of modernity, the logic of coloniality and the grammar of de-coloniality. Cultural studies, 21(2-3), 449-514. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162647
Minor, J., & Boyce, G. A. (2018). Smokey Bear and the pyropolitics of United States forest governance. Political Geography, 62, 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.10.005
Mitchell, S. (2017). Constellations of Inequality. University of Chicago Press.
Moore, A. (2008). Rethinking scale as a geographical category: From analysis to practice. Progress in Human Geography, 32(2), 203–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132507087647
Nepomuceno, Í., Affonso, H., Fraser, J. A., & Torres, M. (2019). Counter-conducts and the green grab: Forest peoples’ resistance to industrial resource extraction in the Saracá-Taquera National Forest, Brazilian Amazonia. Global Environmental Change, 56(April), 124–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.04.004
Oslender, U. (2021). Decolonizing cartography and ontological conflict: Counter-mapping in Colombia and “cartographies otherwise.” Political Geography, 89(July 2020), 102444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102444
Paes, C. de F. (2021). “As Brazil's military pulls out of the Amazon, its legacy is in question.” Mongabay Environmental News. 8 April 2021, https://news.mongabay.com/2021/04/as-brazils-military-pulls-out-of-the-amazon-its-legacy-is-in-question/.
Peixoto, R. & Saraiva, O. (orgs). (2022). Dossiê Bem Viver na Amazônia. Revista Humanitas, 2(1/2). Belém: IFCH/UFPA.
Phillips, T. (2019,). “Bolsonaro Declares 'the Amazon Is Ours' and Calls Deforestation Data 'Lies'.” The Guardian, 19 July 2019, www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jul/19/jair-bolsonaro-brazil-amazon-rainforest-deforestation.
Porto-Gonçalves, C. W. (2005). Amazônia, amazônias. Editora Contexto.
Porto-Gonçalves, C. W. (2009). Entre América e Abya Yala – tensões de territorialidades. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, 20, 25–30. https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v20i0.16231
Porto-Gonçalves, C. W. (2012). A ecologia política na América Latina: reapropriação social da natureza e reinvenção dos territórios. INTERthesis 41(4), 309–321. https://doi.org/10.1037/xan0000073
“Projetos levam desenvolvimento sustentável para comunidades do Lago Maria Pixi, em Oriximiná” (2023). G1 Santarém e Região, 14 Mar. 2023, https://g1.globo.com/pa/santarem-regiao/noticia/2023/03/14/projetos-levam-desenvolvimento-sustentavel-para-comunidades-do-lago-maria-pixi-em-oriximina.ghtml
Richards, P., & VanWey, L. (2015). Where Deforestation Leads to Urbanization: How Resource Extraction Is Leading to Urban Growth in the Brazilian Amazon. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105(4), 806–823. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2015.1052337
Robinson, W. I. (2015). The transnational state and the BRICS: a global capitalism perspective. Third World Quarterly, 36(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.976012
Rubis, J. M., & Theriault, N. (2020). Concealing protocols: conservation, Indigenous survivance, and the dilemmas of visibility. Social and Cultural Geography, 21(7), 962-984. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2019.1574882
Sack, R. (1986) Human Territoriality. Cambridge University Press.
Sandoval, L. M. F., Robertsdotter, A., & Paredes, M. (2017). Space, Power, and Locality: the Contemporary Use of Territorio in Latin American Geography. Journal of Latin American Geography, 16(1), 43–67. https://doi.org/10.1353/lag.2017.0009
Santos, A. B. dos. (2015). Colonização, Quilombos: modos e significações. Brasília, DF: INCTI - UnB.
Santos, M. (1994). O retorno do território. In Território: globalização e fragmentação. Santos, M. [et al.] (eds.). São Paulo: Hucitec.
Science Panel for the Amazon. (2021). “Amazon Assessment Report 2021 Chapter 14 Amazon in motion : Changing politics , development strategies , peoples , landscapes , and livelihoods.” United Nations Sustainable Development Solutions Network, New York.
Svampa, M. (2008). La disputa por el desarrollo: territorio, movimientos de carácter socio-ambiental y discursos dominantes. In Cambio de época. Movimientos sociales y poder político, 1-31.
Tsing, A. (2005). Friction: an Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton University Press.
Zaragocin, S., & Caretta, M. A. (2021). Cuerpo-Territorio: A Decolonial Feminist Geographical Method for the Study of Embodiment. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 111(5), 1503–1518. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1812370
Zibechi, R. (2012). Territories in Resistance. AK Press.
Vega, A., Fraser, J. A., Torres, M., & Loures, R. (2022). Those who live like us: Autodemarcations and the co-becoming of Indigenous and beiradeiros on the Upper Tapajós River, Brazilian Amazonia. Geoforum, 129(March 2021), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2022.01.003
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Benjamin Kantner