Non-state actors, extractive industries, and the investment regime: What can be learned from six Amazonian investor-state disputes?


investor-state disputes
non-state actors
political risks
extractive sector

How to Cite

Silva, P. (2023). Non-state actors, extractive industries, and the investment regime: What can be learned from six Amazonian investor-state disputes?. Alternautas, 10(1), 5–33.


The international investment regime was designed to reduce political risks—risks created by government action or inaction—faced by enterprises venturing abroad. It assumes that political risks are due to unitary host states, who, guided by national interests, would confiscate profitable foreign enterprises when opportune. This article argues, however, that political risks can have a different origin. In ecologically vulnerable areas, extractive projects can be polarizing, as some groups benefit from their existence while others suffer their consequences. In this setting, non-state actors may fight legally and politically to attract or expel extractive industries, generating policy uncertainties and political risk. To check this argument, the article examines five investor-state disputes coming from extractive projects located in the Amazon and which were caused, in part or completely, by the actions of non-state actors. The cases studied provide insights into the importance of non-state actors in the investment realm as well as the inadequacies of the current investment regime.


van Aaken, A. (2010) ‘The International Investment Protection Regime through the Lens of Economic Theory.’ In Michael Waibel, Asha Kaushal, Kyo-Hwa Chung, Claire Balchin (Eds.) The Backlash against Investment Arbitration: Perceptions and Reality. (pp. 537-554) London: Kluwer Law International.

Allee, T. and Peinhardt, C. (2011) ‘Contingent credibility: The impact of investment treaty violations on foreign direct investment.’ International Organizations 65, p 401–32.

Allee, T. and Peinhardt, C. (2014) ‘Evaluating three explanations for the design of bilateral investment treaties.’ World Politics 66(1), p47–87.

Alvarez, J. E. (2011). The Public International Law Regime Governing International Investment. Brill.

Amnesty International. (2012) ‘So that no one can demand anything: Criminalizing the right to protest in Ecuador?’ Available at documents/amr28/002/2012/en/.

Aylwin, J. (2011). ‘The TPPA and Indigenous Peoples: Lessons From Latin America.’ In No Ordinary Deal - Unmasking the Trans-Pacific Partnership Free Trade Agreement, Edited by Jane Kelsey. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.

Bambirra, V. (2012). O Capitalismo Dependente Latino-Americano. Florianópolis: Insular.

Baque-Cantos, M. A., Katiuska, D. and Baque-Parrales, E. M.. (2020) ‘La corrupción y su incidencia en la administración pública; análisis de sus causas y efectos.’ FIPCAEC 17 (5), p137-157.

Bakir, C. (2015) ‘Bargaining with multinationals: Why state capacity matters.’ New Political Economy 20(1), p63-84.

Behn, D., Fauchald, O. K. and Langford, M. (2022) Chapter 2: The international investment regime and its discontents. In: The legitimacy of investment arbitration. Cambridge University Press.

Bonnitcha, J. and Williams, Z. (2019). ‘State liability for ‘politically’ motivated conduct in the investment treaty regime’. Leiden Journal of International Law 33, p77–100.

Bortner, D. D. (2021) Amending ICSID to safeguard indigenous rights. Georgetown Journal of International Law 52(4), p1057-1106.

Brower, C. N. and Blanchard, S. (2014) ‘What’s in a meme? The truth about investor-state arbitration: Why it need not, and must not, be repossessed by states.’ Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 52, p689–777.

Burlington Resources, Inc. v. Republic of Ecuador (ICSID Case No. ARB/08/5) (2010) Award on jurisdiction.

Cedeño, Y. E. (2018) ‘El modelo de desarrollo de la etnia Shuar de la parroquia Yungaza de la provincia de Morona-Santiago.’ Trabajo de Titulación. Licenciatura en Gestión para el Desarrollo Local Sostenible, Universidad Politécnica Salesiana-Cuenca.

Chevron Corporation (USA) and Texaco Petroleum Company (USA) v. The Republic of Ecuador. (2009) Notice of arbitration.

Chevron Corporation (USA) and Texaco Petroleum Company (USA) v. The Republic of Ecuador. (2018) Second partial award on track II.

Choi, W. M. (2007) ‘The Present and the Future of the Investor-State Dispute Settlement Paradigm.’ Journal of International Economic Law 10(3), p725–747.

Cosigo Resources, Ltd., Cosigo Resources Sucursal Colombia, Tobie Mining and Energy, Inc. v. Republic of Colombia. (2016) Notice of arbitration and statement of claims.

Crude: The real price of oil. (2009) Directed by Joe Berlinger [Film]. United States: Produced by Joe Berlinger, Michael Bonfiglio, Richard Stratton and J.R. DeLeon.

Diario Correo. (2017) ‘Embarcación produce derrame de petróleo crudo en río Ucayali.’ Diario Correo, 13 January.

Dupuy, P.M. and Viñuales, J.E. (eds.) (2013) ‘Harnessing foreign investment to promote environmental protection, incentives and safeguards.’ Cambridge University Press.

Evans, P. (1979) Dependent development: The alliance of multinational state and local capital in Brazil. Princeton University Press.

Feighery, T. J. (2014) ‘In Search of a roadmap: Lessons for the ISDS regime in the U.S. experience of lump-sum claims settlement processes.’ Transnational Dispute Management 11(1)

FINAE, FIPSE and FICSH. (2003). Letter from Shuar and Achuar peoples to the CEO of Burlington Resources.

Franck, S. (2007) ‘Empirically evaluating claims about investment treaty arbitration.’ North Carolina Law Review 86(1), p1–88.

Guzman, A. T. (1998) ‘Why LDCs sign treaties that hurt them: Explaining the popularity of bilateral investment treaties.’ Virginia Journal of International Law 38, p639–688.

Hajzler, C. (2012) ‘Expropriation of foreign direct investments: Sectoral patterns from 1993 to 2006.’ Review of World Economics 148(1), p119–49.

High, C. (2020) ‘Our land is not for sale!’: Contesting oil and translating environmental politics in Amazonian Ecuador. The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology 25 (2), p185-362.

Hobson, J. A. (1902) Imperialism: A study. London: Ballantine, Hannon and Co.

Hodgson, M., Kryvoi, Y. and Hrcka, D. (2021) ‘Costs, damages and duration in Investor-State Arbitration.’ British Institute of International and Comparative Law. Available at:

Jernelöv, A. (2010) ‘The threats from oil spills: Now, then, and in the future.’ AMBIO 39:353–366.

Jimbicti Pandama, T. (2004) ‘El petroleo en la region Amazonica: El bloque 24 y los derechos colectivos en la nacionalidad Shuar.’ Tesis. Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Ecuador.

Jodice, D. (1980) ‘Sources of change in third world regimes for foreign direct investment, 1968-1976.’ International Organization 34, p177–206.

Kimerling, J. (2005) "Indigenous peoples and the oil frontier in Amazonia: The case of Ecuador, ChevronTexaco, and Aguinda v. Texaco". New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 38, p413–538.

Klein, N. (2000) No logo: Taking aim at the brand bullies. New York: Picador.

Kobrin, S. (1984) ‘Expropriation as an attempt to control foreign firms in LDCs: Trends from 1960 to 1979.’ International Studies Quarterly 28(3), p329–48.

Kobrin, S. (1987) ‘Testing the bargaining hypothesis in the manufacturing sector in developing countries.’ International Organization 41(4), p609–38.

Koremenos, B., Lipson, C., and Snidal, D. (2001) ‘The rational design of international institutions.’ International Organization 55(4), p761-799.

Lang, A. (2011). World Trade Law After Neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.

Lessmann, J., Fajardo, J., Muñoz, J. and Bonaccorso, E. (2016) ‘Large expansion of oil industry in the Ecuadorian Amazon: biodiversity vulnerability and conservation alternatives.’ Ecology and evolution 6(14), p4997–5012.

Lucas, R. E. (1990) ‘Why doesn’t capital flow from rich to poor countries?’ The American Economic Review 80(2), p92–96.

Lu, F., Valdivia, G. and Silva, N. (2017) Oil, Revolution and Indigenous Citizenship in Ecuadorian Amazonia. New York: Palgrave McMillan.

Diario del País (2015) ‘Lluvia de demandas contra PPK.’ Diario del País, 10 April. Available at: https:/ /

Martins, B. R., Rodrigues, J., de Oliveira, V., Ribeiro, S., Barros, W., and Schwartz, G. (2022) ‘Mining in the Amazon: Importance, impacts, and challenges to restore degraded ecosystems. Are we on the right way?’ Ecological Engineering 174.

Mien, E. and Goujon, M. (2022) ‘40 Years of Dutch Disease Literature: Lessons for Developing Countries.’ Comparative Economic Studies 64, p351–383.

Moran, T. (1978) ‘Multinational Corporations and Dependency: a Dialogue for Dependentistas and Non-Dependentistas.’ International Organization 32(1), p79–100.

Moran, T., Graham, E., and Blomström, M. (2005) ‘Introduction and Overview.’ In Does Foreign Direct Investment Promote Development? Edited by T. Moran, E. M. Graham, and M. Blomström, 1-19. Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Occidental Petroleum Corporation and Occidental Exploration and Production Company v. Republic of Ecuador (ICSID Case No. ARB/06/11) (2012) Award.

Otra Mirada. (2015) ‘Los negocios del candidato PPK.’ Otra Mirada, 5 May. Available at:

Peinhardt, C. and Wellhausen, R. L. (2016) ‘Withdrawing from Investment Treaties but Protecting Investment.’ Global Policy 7(4), p571–576.

Peterson, L. E. (2009, September 19) Dominican Republic settles trio of electricity arbitrations. IA Reporter.

Pinto, P. M. (2013) Partisan Investment in the Global Economy: Why the Left Loves Foreign Direct Investment and FDI Loves the Left. Cambridge University Press.

Potestà, M. (2013) ‘Legitimate expectations in investment treaty law: Understanding the roots and the limits of a controversial concept.’ ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal 28 (1), p88–122.

Poulsen, L. S. and Aisbett, E. (2013) ‘When the Claim Hits: Bilateral Investment Treaties and Bounded Rational Learning.’ World Politics 65 (2), p273-313.

Price, D. M. (2000) ‘Chapter 11 - Private party versus government, investor-state dispute settlement: Frankenstein or safety valve?’ Canada-United States Law Journal 26, p107–114.

Raymond, N. (2014, March 19) Chevron seeks $32 million in legal fees in Ecuador case. Reuters. Retrieved from:

Rollins, C. E. (1956) ‘Mineral development and economic growth.’ Social Research 23(3), p253-280.

Sabin, P. (1998) ‘Searching for middle ground: Native communities and oil extraction in the northern and central Ecuadorian Amazon, 1967-1993.’ Environmental History 3(2):144-168.

Sabir, S., Qayyum, U. and Majeed, T. (2020) ‘FDI and environmental degradation: the role of political institutions in South Asian countries.’ Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27, p32544–32553.

Sánchez, J. (1993) Menos estado y más gobierno. Ecuador Debate 30, p44-53.

Simmons, J. B. (2012) ‘Valuation in investor-state arbitration: Toward a more exact science.’ Berkeley Journal of International Law 30(1), p196-250.

Sun, P., Deng, Z. and Wright, M. (2021. ‘Partnering with Leviathan: The politics of innovation in foreign-host-state joint ventures.’ Journal of International Business Studies volume 52, p595–620.

UNCTAD. (2023) ‘Investment dispute settlement navigator’ United Nations Conference on Trade and Development 2023. Available at investment-dispute-settlement

Vernon, R. (1971) Sovereignty at bay: The multinational spread of US enterprises. New York: Penguin Books.

Vijaya, R., and Kaltani, L. (2007) ‘Foreign direct investment and wages: a bargaining power approach.’ Journal of World-Systems Research 13(1), p83–95.

Wetzlmaier, M. (2012) ‘Cultural impacts of mining in indigenous peoples’ ancestral domains in the Philippines.’ ASEAS - Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies 5(2), p335-344.

Williams, Z. (2017, December 4) Ecuador settles long-running ICSID arbitration with US oil company. IA Reporter.

Williams, Z. (2022). The Political Economy of Investment Arbitration. Oxford University Press.

Worth Capital Holdings 27 LLC v. Republic of Peru (ICSID Case No. ARB/20/51) 2022 International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes. Memorial on Merits.

Yackee, J. W. (2008) ‘Bilateral Investment Treaties, Credible Commitment, and the Rule of (International) Law: Do BITs Promote Foreign Direct Investment?’ Law and Society Review 42(4), p805–831.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Pedro Robrto Nunes da Silva


Download data is not yet available.