Abstract
Dependency theory is arguably the most important theoretical tradition to emerge from Latin America. Functioning as a vital source of counter-representation and contestation, it challenged the prevailing developmental orthodoxies of the time. During its heyday in the 1960s and early 1970s it served simultaneously to critique prevailing power relations within the global political economy and as a political programme for domestic and regional transformation, defined in terms of self-determination and political autonomy. However, with the broader crisis of developmentalism in the 1970s, a counter movement to the radicalism of dependency analysis was provided by authoritarian populism. The victory of authoritarian populism helped contribute to the death of Third Worldism as a political project and with it, dependency theory fell into decline. In the current conjuncture, this paper calls for a new dialectics of dependency theory. A reinvigorated dependency critique is needed to address the prevailing developmentalism of the left in Latin America that has remained in thrall to extractivism and thus continues the region’s peripheral role as a commodity exporter to the Global North, built on the foundations of cheap nature and cheap labour. Furthermore, a dependency-informed analysis is required to challenge contemporary modes of authoritarian populism and statism that are being celebrated geopolitically in the form of the BRICS grouping. To do so, I make the case for considering dependency theory as a radical contribution to the literature on the production of space.
References
Acosta, A. (2013). Extractivism and neoextractivism: two sides of the same curse, In M. Lang and D. Mokranai (eds). Beyond Development: Alternative visions from Latin America. Quito: Transnational Institute / Rosa Luxemburg Foundation, pp61-86
Acosta, A. (2016). Las dependencias del extractivismo. Aporte para un debate incompleto. Actuel Marx Intervenciones, 20, 123-154.
Alvarez, S., Dagnino, E. and Escobar, A, (eds) (1998) Cultures of politics/politics of cultures: Revisioning Latin American social movements, Boulder, CO: Westview Press
Angosto-Ferrández, LF (2021). Reframing resource nationalism: social forces and the politics of extractivism in Latin America's pink tide. In S. Ellner (ed) Latin American extractivism: dependency, resource nationalism, and resistance in broad perspective. London: Rowman & Littlefield, pp105-128
Antunes de Oliveira, F. (2019) The rise of the Latin American far-right explained: dependency theory meets uneven and combined development, Globalizations, 16:7, 1145-1164
Antunes de Oliveira, F. (2021). Who are the super-exploited? Gender, race, and the intersectional potentialities of dependency theory. In A. Madariaga and S. Palestini (eds.), Dependent Capitalisms in Contemporary Latin America and Europe. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 101-128.
Antunes de Oliveira, F. (2024). Dependency and Crisis in Brazil and Argentina: A Critique of Market and State Utopias. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press
Arboleda, M. (2020). Planetary Mine: Territories, of Extraction under Late Capitalism. London: Verso
Avilés, D. (2024). Spatial political economy: The ideology of Nature, State–space and the oil commodity frontier. Environment and Planning F, DOI: 26349825231217149.
Bambirra, V. (1973). Capitalismo Dependiente Latinoamericano, Santiago: Editorial Prensa Latinoamericana (PLA).
Bambirra, V. (1978). Teoría de la dependencia: una anticrítica. Mexico City: Serie Popular Era
Bebbington, A. (2009). The new extraction: rewriting the political ecology of the Andes?. NACLA Report on the Americas, 42(5), 12-20.
Bieler, A. and Morton, A.D. (2014). Uneven and Combined Development and Unequal Exchange: The Second Wind of Neoliberal “Free Trade”? Globalizations, 11 (1), 35–45
Biersteker, T. (1995) The ‘triumph’ of liberal economic ideas in the developing world, In B. Stallings (ed.), Global Change, Regional Response: The New International Context of Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 174-196
Bond, P. (2016). BRICS banking and the debate over sub-imperialism, Third World Quarterly, 37:4, 611-629
Bowles, P. and N. Andrews (2023). Extractive Bargains: Natural Resources and the State-Society Nexus. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan
Brenner, R. (1977). The origins of capitalist development: a critique of neo-Smithian Marxism. New Left Review, (104), 25-92
Brenner, N (2004). New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Burchardt, H. J. and Dietz, K. (2014). (Neo-) extractivism–a new challenge for development theory from Latin America. Third world quarterly, 35(3), 468-486.
Burchardt, H. J., Dietz, K., and Warnecke-Berger, H. (2021). Dependency, rent, and the failure of neo-extractivism. In A. Madariaga and S. Palestini (eds.), Dependent Capitalisms in Contemporary Latin America and Europe. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan,, 207-229.
Cardoso, H. F. (1972). Dependent capitalist development in Latin America. New Left Review, 74 (July), 83-95
Cardoso, F. H. and Faletto, E. (1979) Dependency and development in Latin America. Translated by M. Uruidi. Berkeley: University of California Press.
De Carvalho, B. (2021). Sovereignty in Historical International Relations: Trajectories, challenges, and implications. In: B. de Carvalho, J. Costa Lopez, and H. Leira, eds., Routledge Handbook of Historical International Relations. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 220-230.
Chilcote, R. H., & Salém Vasconcelos, J. (2022). Introduction: Whither Development Theory? Latin American Perspectives, 49(1), 4-17.
Collins, J. (2021). Rent. Cambridge: Polity
Coronil, F (1997). The Magical State: Nature, Money and Modernity in Venezuela, London: University of Chicago Press.
Desai, R. (2013a) ‘The Brics are building a challenge to western economic supremacy’, The Guardian, 2 April 2013: www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/apr/02/brics-challenge-western-supremacy (accessed 4/7/24)
Dos Santos, T. (1969). Socialismo o Fascismo: Dilema Latinoamericano, Santiago, Prensa Latinoamericana (PLA).
Dos Santos, T. (1970). The structure of dependence. The American Economic Review, 60(2), 231-236.
ECLAC (2007). Economic Growth with Equity Challenges for Latin America (edited by R. Ffrench-Davis and J.L Machinea). Basingstoe: Palgrave McMillan
Emmanuel, A. (1972). Unequal Exchange: A Study of the Imperialism of Free Trade. New York: Monthly Review Press
Frank, A. G. (1985). Critique and Anti-Critique: Essays in Dependence and Reformism. New York: Praeger
Frank, A.G (2000[1966]) ‘The Development of Underdevelopment’ in Latin America: Underdevelopment or Revolution London: Monthly Review Press
Fusaro, L. (2019). The development of underdevelopment before and beyond dependency theory and Political Marxism: Rereading Marx’s General Law of Capitalist Accumulation. In Baker, P, I. Feldman, M. Geddes, F. Lagos and R. Pareja (eds). (2019) Latin American Marxisms in context: Past and Present, Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp3-23
Gago, V. and Mezzadra, S. (2017). A critique of the extractive operations of capital: Toward an expanded concept of extractivism. Rethinking Marxism, 29(4), 574-591.
Galeano, E (2008) Open Veins of Latin America: Five Centuries of the Pillage of a Continent New Delhi: Three Essays Collective
García Linera, A. (2011). Las tensiones creativas de la Revolución: La quinta fase del proceso de cambio. La Paz, Bolivia: Vicepresidencia del Estado Plurinacional.
García Linera, Á. (2012). Geopolítica de la Amazonía: Poder hacendal-patrimonial y acumulación capitalista. La Paz, Bolivia: Vicepresidencia del Estado Plurinacional.
Gilpin, R. (1987). The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Grosfoguel, R. (2000). Developmentalism, modernity, and dependency theory in Latin America. Nepantla: views from south, 1(2), 347-374
Grugel, J., and Riggirozzi, P. (2012). Post‐neoliberalism in Latin America: Rebuilding and reclaiming the State after crisis. Development and Change, 43(1), 1-21.
Gudynas, E. (2009). Diez tesis urgentes sobre el nuevo extractivismo: Contextos y demandas bajo el progresismo sudamericano actual’, in Centro Andino de Acción Popular and Centro Latino Americano de Ecología Social (eds.), Extractivismo, política, y sociedad, Quito: Centro Andino de Acción Popular y Centro Latino Americano de Ecología Social, pp187-225
Gudynas, E. (2013a). Debates on development and its alternatives in Latin America: a brief heterodox guide. In M. Lang and D. Mokranai (eds). Beyond Development: Alternative visions from Latin America. Quito: Transnational Institute / Rosa Luxemburg Foundation, pp15-40
Gudynas. E. (2013b) Transitions to post-extractivism: directions, options, areas of action, In M. Lang and D. Mokranai (eds). Beyond Development: Alternative visions from Latin America. Quito: Transnational Institute / Rosa Luxemburg Foundation, pp165-187
Halvorsen, S., Fernandes, B. M., & Torres, F. V. (2019). Mobilizing territory: socioterritorial movements in comparative perspective. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 109(5), 1454-1470.
Henfrey, C. (1981). Dependency, modes of production, and the class analysis of Latin America. Latin American Perspectives, 8(3-4), 17-54.
Hesketh, C. (2017a). Passive revolution: A universal concept with geographical seats. Review of International Studies, 43(3), 389-408.
Hesketh, C. (2017b). Spaces of capital/Spaces of Resistance: Mexico and the global political economy. Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia Press.
Hesketh, C. (2022). Clean development or the development of dispossession? The political economy of wind parks in Southern Mexico. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 5(2), 543-565.
Hesketh, C. (2024a). Finding space in the modes of production debate: The value of Latin America. Environment and Planning F, doi:10.1177/26349825231193224
Hesketh, C. (2024b). Indigenous environmentalism: For a political economy where people (and planet) matter. European Journal of Social Theory, 27(3), 398-417.
Hesketh, C (2025). Indigenous resistance at the frontiers of accumulation: Challenging the coloniality of space in International Relations, Review of International Studies, 51 (1), 64-83
Hesketh, C. and Morton, A. D. (2014). Spaces of uneven development and class struggle in Bolivia: Transformation or trasformismo? Antipode, 46(1), 149-169.
Hopewell, K. (2017). The BRICS—merely a fable? Emerging power alliances in global trade governance. International Affairs, 93(6), 1377-1396.
de Janvry, A. (1981). The Agrarian Question and Reformism in Latin America. London: John Hopkins University Press
Kay, C. (2010). Latin American Theories of Development and Underdevelopment. London: Routledge.
Katz, C. (2018). La teoría de la dependencia, cincuenta años después. Buenos Aires: Batalla de Ideas.
Katz, C. (2021). The Cycle of Dependency 50 Years Later. Latin American Perspectives, 49 (2), 8-23
Kiely, R. (2007). The New Political Economy of Development: Globalization, Imperialism, Hegemony. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kvangraven, I. H. (2021). Beyond the stereotype: Restating the relevance of the dependency research programme. Development and Change, 52(1), 76-112.
Lefebvre, H (1991). The Production of Space translated by D. Nicholson-Smith. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lefebvre, H (1976) The Survival of Capitalism: Reproduction of the Relations of Production translated by F. Bryant. London: Allison and Busby
Lefebvre, H. (2003). Space and State. In N. Brenner, B. Jessop, M. Jones and G Macleod (eds), State/Space: A Reader. Oxford Blackwell.
Lefebvre, H. (2009 [1966]). Theoretical problems of autogestion. in N. Brenner and S. Elden (eds.), State, space, world: Selected essays. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Lefebvre, H. (2022). The Marxist-Leninist Theory of Ground Rent. In H. Lefebvre On the Rural: Economy, Sociology, Geography (eds S. Elden and A.D Morton), translated by R. Bononno. London: University of Minnesota Press, pp115-150
Lema Habash, N. (2019). The Problem of Enclosure in José Carlos Mariátegui’s Seven Interpretive Essays on Peruvian Reality, in Baker, P, I. Feldman, M. Geddes, F. Lagos and R. Pareja (eds). Latin American Marxisms in context: Past and Present, Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp91-113
Lubbock, R. (2024). Cultivating Socialism: Venezuela, ALBA, and the Politics of Food Sovereignty. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press
Marini, R.M. (2022). The Dialectics of Dependency (translated by A. Latimer). New York: Monthly Review Press
Martins, C. E. (2021). The Longue Durée of the Marxist Theory of Dependency and the Twenty-First Century. Latin American Perspectives, 49 (1), pp18-35
Marx, K. (1973). Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy. Translated by M. Nicolaus. London: Penguin.
Marx. K. (1981). Capital Vol. III: The Process of Capitalist Production as a Whole. London: Penguin
Massey, D. (1994). Space, Place and Gender. Cambridge: Polity
Mignolo, W. (2000). Local Histories/Global Designs: Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges, and Border Thinking. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Nash, J. (1994). Global integration and subsistence insecurity. American Anthropologist, 96(1), 7–30.
Nilsen, A.G, von Holdt, K, Lee, C.K, Barbosa Dos Santos, L.F and Braga, R. (2025). Southern Interregnum: Remaking Hegemony in Brazil, India, China, and South Africa. Manchester: Manchester University Press
O’Neill, J (2001). Building Better Global Economic BRICs. Global Economics Paper No. 66. New York, NY: Goldman Sachs.
Osorio, J. (2022). Assessing a proposal for updating the Marxist theory of dependency. Latin American Perspectives, 49(1), 153-165.
Papa, M., Han, Z., & O’Donnell, F. (2023). The dynamics of informal institutions and counter-hegemony: introducing a BRICS Convergence Index. European Journal of International Relations, 29(4), 960-989.
Patel, R., & McMichael, P. (2004). Third Worldism and the lineages of global fascism: the regrouping of the global South in the neoliberal era. Third World Quarterly, 25(1), 231-254.
Patel, R. and Moore, J. (2020). A History of the World in Seven Cheap Things: A Guide to Capitalism, Nature, and the Future of the Planet. London: Verso
Prashad, V. (2013). Neoliberalism with Southern characteristics: the rise of the BRICS. New York: Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung
Prebisch, R. (1950). The Economic Development of Latin America and its principal problems. New York: United Nations Department of Economic Affairs
Reis, N. and Antunes de Oliveira, F. (2021). Peripheral financialization and the transformation of dependency: a view from Latin America. Review of International Political Economy, 30 (2), 511-543.
Riofrancos, T. (2020). Resource Radicals: From Petro-Nationalism to Post-extractivism in Ecuador. London: Duke University Press
Robinson, W. (2008) Latin America and Global Capitalism: A Critical Globalization Perspective. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press
Robinson, W. I. (2015). The transnational state and the BRICS: a global capitalism perspective. Third World Quarterly, 36(1), 1-21.
Robinson, W. I. (2023). The Travesty of “Anti-Imperialism.” Journal of World-Systems Research, 29(2), 587-601.
Salgado, P. (2022). Embedded authoritarianism: sovereignty, coloniality, and democracy in Latin America. In International Research Group on Authoritarianism and Counter-Strategies (eds.) Global Authoritarianism: Perspectives and Contestations from the South. Bielefeld: Verlag, pp. 25-39
Salgado, P. (2023). Against Sovereignty: the colonial limits of modern politics. Millennium 52(1), 86-108.
Santos, M. (2021). For a New Geography. Minneapolis. University of Minnesota Press
Skidmore, T. and Smith, P. (1992) Modern Latin America. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Slater, D. (2004). Geopolitics and the Post-Colonial: Rethinking North-South Relations. Oxford: Blackwell
Stuenkel, O. (2015). The BRICS and the Future of Global Order. London: Lexington Books.
Svampa, M (2012) ‘Consenso de los commodities, giro ecoterritorial y pensamiento crítico en América Latina’, OSAL, 13 (32), 15-38.
Tansel, C.B (2020) The Shape of ‘Rising Powers’ to Come? The Antinomies of Growth and Neoliberal Development in Turkey, New Political Economy, 25:5, 791-812
Taylor, J. G. (1979). From modernization to modes of production: a critique of the sociologies of development and underdevelopment. London: Macmillan Press
Taylor, I. (2016). BRICS and Capitalist Hegemony: Passive Revolution in Theory and Practice, S.F Christensen and X. Ling (eds). Emerging Powers, Emerging Markets, Emerging Societies: Global Response. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan p55-84.
Tilley, L. (2021). Extractive investibility in historical colonial perspective: the emerging market and its antecedents in Indonesia. Review of International Political Economy, 28(5), 1099-1118.
Treacy, M. (2022). Dependency theory and the critique of neodevelopmentalism in Latin America. Latin American Perspectives, 49(1), 218-236.
Veltmeyer, H. (2016). Investment, governance and resistance in the new extractive economies of Latin America. In Mining in Latin America. In Deonandan, K and Dougherty, M. L. (eds) Mining in Latin America: critical approaches to the new extraction. London: Routledge, pp. 27-44).
Veltmeyer, H. and Petras, J. (2014). The New Extractivism: A Post-Neoliberal Development Model or Imperialism of the Twenty-First Century. London: Zed
Wilson, D, and Purushothaman, R. (2003). Dreaming with BRICs: The path to 2050 Global Economics Paper Vol. 99. New York, NY: Goldman, Sachs.
Wittman, H., Powell, L. J., and Corbera, E. (2015). Financing the agrarian transition? The clean development mechanism and agricultural change in Latin America. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 47(10), 2031–2046
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Chris Hesketh