Abstract
The Caoní River watershed, located within the Pichincha Chocó Andino Biosphere Reserve in northwestern Ecuador, is a territory affected by deforestation dynamics and water pollution. In response, citizen groups have mobilized to protect the river as a living entity through the creation of the Salvemos el Caoní initiative, supported by NGOs and academia. This article explores how transdisciplinary research tools implemented within the framework of an international cooperation project have contributed to building and strengthening a shared identity around the river as a common good in a context of ecosystem and human social fragmentation. The methodology integrates three transdisciplinary research tools under the umbrella of an embodied learning approach: community river monitoring, the co-construction of environmental narratives, and participatory mapping. The objective is to identify both the benefits and challenges of these tools in mapping sources of pollution, assessing species at risk, and collectively designing a watershed conservation mechanism within a context of local tensions among multiple interests and actors surrounding the river. Finally, the article analyzes how, on the one hand, the process strengthened local capacities and fostered trust and cooperation among municipalities, community organizations, private stakeholders, and academia. On the other hand, it examines both the progress and tensions involved in strengthening collective identity and action around the river as a necessary prior step toward defending the river as a rights-bearing subject under Ecuador’s constitutional framework of the Rights of Nature.
References
Acción Ecológica (2024). El Choco Andino sigue en peligro. https://www.accionecologica.org/el-choco-andino-sigue-en-peligro/?print=pdf
Alier, J. M. (2021). El ecologismo de los pobres: conflictos ambientales y lenguajes de valoración. Icaria.
Alvarado-Arias, N., Soria-Delgado, J., Staines, J., & Moya-Almeida, V. (2025). Towards participatory river governance through citizen science. Water, 17(9), 1358.
Boelens, R., E. Shah, and B. Bruins. 2019. “Contested Knowledges: Large Dams and Mega-Hydraulic Development.” Water 11 (3): 416.
Boelens, R., Escobar, A., Bakker, K., Hommes, L., Swyngedouw, E., Hogenboom, B., ... & Wantzen, K. M. (2022). Riverhood: political ecologies of socionature commoning and translocal struggles for water justice. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 1-32.
Boelens, R., Hommes, L., & Hoogesteger, J. (2024). Ontological politics in river defence debates: Unpacking fields of contention in eco-centric and non-human turns. Water Alternatives, 17(3), 649-668.
Celi, J. E., & Villamarín, F. (2020). Freshwater ecosystems of Mainland Ecuador: Diversity, issues and perspectives. Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia, 32, e106.
CEPF (2021). Perfil del Ecosistema. Hotspot de Biodiversidad de los Andes Tropicales.
Davenport, M. A., & Anderson, D. H. (2005). Getting from sense of place to place-based management: An interpretive investigation of place meanings and perceptions of landscape change. Society and natural resources, 18(7), 625-641.
de Souza, D. T., van Teijlingen, K., Boelens, R., & Ruales, G. (2025). Seeing rivers otherwise: Critical cartography as a form of critical pedagogy. Geoforum, 158, 104167.
Duarte-Abadía, B., et al. 2019. “Mobilizing Water Actors and Bodies of Knowledge. The Multi-ScalarMovement Against the Río Grande Dam in Málaga, Spain.” Water 11 (3): 410.
Dupuits, E., Puertas, C., & Intriago, M. (2024). Descolonizando el conocimiento: Visiones plurales de la conservación del agua en la sierra ecuatoriana. Debates En Sociología, (59), 147–172.
García, S. A. (2022). Educación ambiental para la sustentabilidad, una apuesta desde la pedagogía crítica y sentipensante. Revista CoPaLa. Construyendo Paz Latinoamericana, 7(14), 68-77.
Global Alliance for the Rights of Nature, GARN (2024). El río Machángara en Ecuador interpone una acción de protección para garantizar sus derechos: El río Machángara en Ecuador interpone una acción de protección para garantizar sus derechos - Global Alliance for the Rights of Nature (GARN)
Haraway, D. (2013). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective 1. In Women, science, and technology (pp. 455-472). Routledge.
Harley, J.B., 1989. Deconstructing the map. Cartographica 26 (2), 1–20.
Hensler, L., Hernández, C. N. A. H., Molina-Rosales, D., Mesa-Jurado, M. A., & Merçon, J. (2024) Investigación colaborativa desde la diversidad.
Hadorn, G. H., Hoffmann-Riem, H., Biber-Klemm, S., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Joye, D., Pohl, C., ... & Zemp, E. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of transdisciplinary research (Vol. 10, pp. 978-1). Dordrecht: Springer.
Hommes, L., Hoogesteger, J., & Boelens, R. (2022). (Re)making hydrosocial territories: Materializing and contesting imaginaries and subjectivities through hydraulic infrastructure. Political Geography, 97, 102698.
Hoogesteger, J., Suhardiman, D., Boelens, R., de Castro, F., Duarte-Abadía, B., Hidalgo-Bastidas, J. P., ... & Vos, J. (2023). River commoning and the state: A cross‐country analysis of river defense collectives. Politics and Governance, 11(2), 280-292.
Humphreys, C., & Blenkinsop, S. (2018). Ecological identity, empathy, and experiential learning: A young child's explorations of a nearby river. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 34(2), 143-158.
Kauffman, C. M., & Martin, P. L. (2023). How Ecuador's Courts Are Giving Form and Force to Rights of Nature Norms. Transnational Environmental Law, 12(2), 366-395.
Jaramillo Ramiro (2016). Análisis de Riesgo por Amenaza de inundación, deslizamientos y contaminación del rio Caoní en Puerto Quito, provincia de Pichincha. Quito, Instituto de Altos Estudios Nacionales (IAEN).
Lewsley, H., Vermeulen, B., Dollin, J., & Ryan, M. (2025). Storying the river: Toward a feminist ethics of care. Environmental Humanities, 17(2), 525-535.
Li, G. (2024). Constructing river ethics: A new paradigm for the harmonious coexistence between humans and rivers. River, 3(3), 221-224.
Martinez-Moscoso, A., & Warner, M. E. (2025). Courts, rights of rivers and the city: insights from Ecuador. Water International, 1-18.
Merçon, J. (Ed.). (2021). Investigación transdisciplinaria e investigación-acción participativa: Conocimiento y acción para la transformación. CopIt-arXives y Red de Socioecosistemas y Sustentabilidad, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (Conacyt). https://copitarxives.fisica.unam.mx
Mickelsson, M., Thifhulufhelwi, R., Mvulane, P., Brownell, F., Russell, C., & Lotz-Sisitka, H. (2024). Bringing river health into being with citizen science: River commons co-learning and practice. South African Journal of Science, 120(9/10).
Molle, F., P. Mollinga, and P. Wester. 2009. “Hydraulic Bureaucracies and the Hydraulic Mission: Flows of Water, Flows of Power.” Water Alternatives 3 (2): 328–349.
Moore, J. W. (Ed.). (2016). Anthropocene or capitalocene?: Nature, history, and the crisis of capitalism. PM press.
Mosimane, A. W., Breen, C., & Nkhata, B. A. (2012). Collective identity and resilience in the management of common pool resources. International Journal of the Commons, 6(2).
Nicolescu, B. (2014). Methodology of transdisciplinarity. World futures, 70(3-4), 186-199.
O'donnell, E. L., & Talbot-Jones, J. (2018). Creating legal rights for rivers. Ecology and Society, 23(1).
Orozco González, C. E., & Ocasio Torres, M. E. (2023). Aquatic macroinvertebrates as bioindicators of water quality: A study of an ecosystem regulation service in a tropical river. Ecologies, 4(2), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecologies4020015
Oslender, U., 2021. Decolonizing cartography and ontological conflict: Counter-mapping in Colombia and “cartographies otherwise. Polit. Geogr. 89, 102444. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102444.
Pérez, J. H., Rocha Gil, Z. E., Pérez Rubiano, C. C., Parrales Ramírez, D. A., & Angulo Flórez, D. H. (2024). Evolución de la calidad de agua en un sistema hídrico del norte de Boyacá utilizando el índice BMWP/Col. Boletín Científico del Centro de Museos.
Ravera, F., Fernández-Giménez, M. E., & Oteros-Rozas, E. (2023). Reflexivity, embodiment, and ethics of care in rangeland political ecology: reflections of three feminist researchers on the experience of transdisciplinary knowledge co-production. Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 5, 1144668.
Reed, M. G., Robson, J. P., Campos Rivera, M., Chapela, F., Davidson‐Hunt, I., Friedrichsen, P., ... & Vasseur, L. (2023). Guiding principles for transdisciplinary sustainability research and practice. People and Nature, 5(4), 1094-1109.
Stolz, S. A. (2015). Embodied learning. Educational philosophy and theory, 47(5), 474-487.
Streck, D. R. (2021). TRANSDISCIPLINARITY AS A DECOLONIZING RESEARCH PRACTICE: A LATIN AMERICAN PERSPECTIVE. Diálogos Latinoamericanos, 29, 88–100.
Tubić, B., et al. (2024). Aquatic insects (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera) as indicators of changes in water quality in hilly and mountainous streams. Water, 16(6), 849.
Villalba Lascano, A. N. (2024). Desarrollo de una línea base de calidad de agua en tres ríos de la Mancomunidad del Chocó Andino entre los meses de abril y agosto: monitoreo de los ríos Pachijal y Chirapi.
Vilsmaier, U. (2025). Aprendiendo de Paulo Freire para la investigación transdisciplinaria: principios, métodos y experiencias.
Zonta, A. L., Jacobi, J., Mukhovi, S. M., Birachi, E., Groote, P. V., & Abad, C. R. (2023). The role of transdisciplinarity in building a decolonial bridge between science, policy, and practice. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 32(1), 107-114. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.32.1.7

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Emilie Dupuits, Cecilia Puertas
